The Person Who Left: Why Your Best Placement Reference Isn’t on the Host’s Website
So you’ve found a placement that looks right. The photos are good, the host replies quickly, and the reference list glows. That’s the point at which most of us stop digging. But there’s one conversation that can tell you more than any polished testimonial: a short call with the volunteer who was there before you.
Not the one the host puts forward. The one who left, perhaps with mixed feelings, and has no reason to sell you the experience.
Why the host’s own reference list is only half the story
Every organisation curates. It’s not necessarily sinister; people naturally pick the volunteer who loved it, stayed in touch and says nice things. But a reference chosen by the host is a reference with a filter. The person who came before you may have seen the same kitchen, the same workload and the same exit arrangements — and they can tell you what the brochure left out.
Asking for that call is not an accusation. It’s due diligence, the same instinct that makes you read the reviews before booking a guesthouse. You’re not looking for dirt. You’re looking for texture.
How to ask without making it weird
Keep it simple and specific. After your first call with the host, send a short message:
'Before I go further, would you be comfortable putting me in touch with a volunteer who finished a placement in the last year or two? I’d like 15 minutes to ask about day-to-day life. Happy to contact them directly so it isn’t a burden on you.'
That wording does three things. It gives a time frame, it asks for someone recent, and it makes clear you’ll do the chasing. If the host says they’ll pass on your details, ask when you should expect to hear. If they say they’ll set it up, suggest a date. A genuine host will usually make this happen; a stretched one may need a nudge.
The 20-minute call: set the frame first
When you speak, start by saying you’re not asking them to rubbish the place. You want the ordinary stuff. Ask if they’re happy to be honest, and whether they’d rather not answer anything. Most former volunteers appreciate being asked. They remember their own pre-departure nerves.
Take notes. Keep it to six areas.
Food and daily living
- What did a normal week of meals look like, and who paid for what?
- Was drinking water provided, or did you buy it?
- How far was the nearest shop, and how did you get there?
- What did you wish you’d packed that you couldn’t buy locally?
Money and fees
- What was included that you didn’t expect, and what cost extra?
- Were there payments on the ground — transport, materials, 'community contributions'?
- How did you pay, and did you get receipts?
- If you had to claim something back, how did that go?
Safety and support
- When you felt unwell or uneasy, who did you call, and did they answer?
- What was the mobile signal like, and was there a backup?
- Were you ever alone in a way that surprised you?
- What would you have wanted to know before arriving?
Workload and boundaries
- What did a typical day actually involve, hour by hour?
- Was there a written role, or did it shift?
- How many hours were expected, and what happened if you were ill?
- Did you feel useful, or busy?
Exit arrangements
- How did you leave? Was there a handover, a debrief, a lift to the airport?
- Did you get any paperwork or confirmation of your time there?
- What happened to the work you started?
After you left
- Did the host stay in touch? Did you want them to?
- Did anything change after you went home — for the project, the community, the next volunteer?
- Would you do it again with the same host? Why?
That last set matters. A placement that folds the moment volunteers leave is a placement built around visitors, not local priorities. You want to hear that your presence would slot into something already running.
Red flags worth taking seriously
You are not looking for a perfect report. Every placement has rough edges. But some answers should slow you down.
- The host cannot or will not connect you with anyone outside their own contact list. If every reference is a friend, a staff member or a volunteer who now works for them, ask why.
- You are offered a video testimonial instead of a conversation. Fine as a starting point, but it is still a performance.
- The former volunteer is 'too busy' every time you suggest a date, and the host keeps steering you back to their own referee.
- Answers about money are vague in a way that feels practised: 'It all goes to the community' without any breakdown.
- The role changes each time you ask. A flexible placement is one thing; a placement with no plan is another.
- You are pressured to pay a deposit before speaking to anyone. That is a sales tactic, not a safeguarding policy.
If a host is new and has no former volunteers, say so plainly and ask for a local partner, a community representative or a staff member who has been there longer than the current programme. No history is not automatically a red flag, but no curiosity about your questions is.
After the call, trust the pattern
One conversation will not give you the full picture. Compare what the former volunteer said with what the host told you, and with what the written information says. Where do the stories line up? Where do they quietly diverge? You are looking for consistency, not perfection.
And if the call leaves you with a knot in your stomach, pay attention. A purposeful trip should stretch you, not make you feel like you are the only one asking obvious questions. The person who came before you is not a judge of your decision. They are a witness. Ring them before you pack.